![]() ![]() “When you’re talking about the beneficial positive aspects of food you HAVE to incorporate protein…. Scher notes that the researchers had a clear bias against animal-based foods and discounted the importance of protein. In the press release, Mozaffarian is quoted as saying: “The public is pretty confused about how to identify healthier choices in the grocery store, cafeteria, and restaurant… Consumers, policymakers, and even industry are looking for simple tools to guide everyone toward healthier choices.”īut Dr. Tuft’s Food Compass site A novel nutrient profiling system that assesses the healthfulness of foods Tufts University press release: Ranking healthfulness of foods from first to worst Nature Food 2021: Food Compass is a nutrient profiling system using expanded characteristics for assessing healthfulness of foods Additionally, the university released a press release about the results and created a website that lists all the scores in detail. They published the results in Nature Foods in the second week of October, 2021. The end result is a numbered ranking on a scale of 1 (worst) to 100 (best). They applied this ranking to 8032 common foods and beverages consumed by average Americans. to score the “healthfulness” of specific foods, beverages, and mixed meals. These ranking systems are used, they note, to “supply the science for local and national policies such as package labeling, taxation, warning labels and restrictions on marketing to children.”Ĭalled “Food Compass,” the new ranking system uses 54 different nutrient characteristics such as vitamins, minerals, fiber, protein, lipids, phytochemicals etc. Dariush Mozaffarian, the Dean of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, the Tufts researchers spent three years developing the new NPS. Scher notes the results are “misleading, misrepresenting and clearly biased.” Scher notes the researchers created the new rating system because they felt other nutrient profiling systems (NPS) did not do a good enough job advising people what to eat “and they wanted to create a better one.”īut Dr. “The idea was to provide an objective, bias-free, clear, profiling system of healthy and unhealthy foods. In the new ranking, on a scale of 1 to 100, Cheerios earned a “healthfulness” score of 95 and Lucky Charms 60 while a fried egg was 29, cheddar cheese 28, and ground beef just 26. This comes after researchers at Tufts University, in Boston, released a new, highly controversial system for ranking foods based on their nutrient contents. Bret Scher, Diet Doctor’s Medical Director, asks this week in the latest DD News video. ![]() How could processed cereals like Cheerios and sugary Lucky Charms be healthier to eat than eggs, cheese, and ground beef? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |